CSW History class discussions Forum Index CSW History class discussions
Discussion and debate of topics for our classes
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 




The end of the Republic

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CSW History class discussions Forum Index -> Weimar Republic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
abhatia



Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:57 am    Post subject: The end of the Republic Reply with quote

What was the most important ‘miss-calculation’ made by politicians in the waning years of the Republic?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oliviabecker



Joined: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the most obvious mistake and the one that the author is pointing out is how much von Papen and President Hindenburg underestimated Hitler. They saw him as someone that could be a puppet leader, someone who was inspirational, popular and could be controlled. This obviously was a great underestimate, because once Hitler became appointed Chancellor (P.S what's the difference between Chancellor and president?) he took that power and ran with it. I think he was much smarter than either the already established authority or the Communist party thought he was. I wish the reading continued after Hitler became Chancellor because I'm wondering if he used this underestimation to his advantage.

In regards to this reading, I also thought it interesting how there were such clear party lines drawn as the Republic went on. Either you were are on the far left, supporting the Communists or the far right, supporting the NSDAP. In between was the Social Democratic Party but they were quickly becoming less and less popular. This really reminds me of today, with our conflicts regarding "bipartisianship" and it seems like every day more and more battle lines are drawn in between the two.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edangelo



Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I completely agree with Olivia, I think the most prominent miscalculation was the general underestimation of what Hitler and the Nazi party were capable of. Hugenberg, for example, was thinking only in terms of his own political gain, and assumed the NSDAP wasn’t something to worry about or take seriously. When he made an alliance with Hitler he “judged the Nazi movement as lower-class and envisioned the new Germany ruled by a conservative elite”(p223). Other politicians had similar thinking. Von Papen, and the communists never thought the Nazis could gain enough of a following to get any real power. It reminded me of today the people who run for president not under the democratic or republican party. People see them as only a threat to take votes away from one of the two major parties, but never to win. Throughout the reading it was clear that the Nazis were really good at saying the right things too appeal to nearly everyone. They stayed neutral enough while still drawing in lots of different groups. Clearly other politicians didn’t realize what a universal and inspirational appeal the party had, or they would have taken them much more seriously.

Also I Olivia I agree, I found it really interesting how the more moderate political views seemed to disappear during this time. I think these extreme views really aided Nazis success.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lialaaaiaaia



Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to build off Olivia and Emily's post, not only was Hitler grossly underestimated, but Hugenburg furthermore tried to use Hitler to further his own gains. They became allies because Hugenburg freely recognized Hitler's talents... that he was 'an exceptionally popular speaker' and 'an organizer of unaccustomed talent' etc. But as Hugenburg fell, Hitler found ways to further propel himself and the Nazis forward. So, I guess what I'm saying is though certainly there were times where Hitler's potential was overlooked, another miss-calculation was the instances where people did identify just how powerful he was, and made alliances with Hitler to try to manipulate him for personal gains... rather than identifying his strengths and weaknesses, and making their own game-plan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yamsham



Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

have to say the worst decision they made (probably already mentioned) was how they did not take hitler seriously at all. they figured they could controll him probably cause he was shorter than them or something and they had no idea how much influence he had and they rerally did not take his ability to rile up a crown to seriously either. i9 con't help but figure tha the politicians back then were lazy, that or they had no real people skills. taking hitler into their politics gave them the missing link tyhey needed to boost the public's liking of teh republic. if he were for the repabluic the weinmar era would have lasted ages. but alas he had his own plan in mind
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Free Forum






PostPosted:      Post subject: ForumsLand.com

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CSW History class discussions Forum Index -> Weimar Republic All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum hosted by ForumsLand.com - 100% free forum. Powered by phpBB 2.