CSW History class discussions Forum Index CSW History class discussions
Discussion and debate of topics for our classes
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 




Oppressed by Evolution

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CSW History class discussions Forum Index -> Art of Prediction
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TravisLaw



Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:45 pm    Post subject: Oppressed by Evolution Reply with quote

- What is the point of view of the fundamentalist right and the multicultural left.
- How might the ideas apply to your final project?


are the questions.



The point of view of the fundamentalist right and the multicultural left is that the moral result of Evolution is acting as a dictator. They see many ways of looking at the world, and feel like Evolution having the exclusive backing of Science is an attempt at mind control.

To me, this seems likely, and if it is true, then I would argue that the critics are forgetting what the context of science is. By context, I mean the goals, methods, and most important, assumptions which surround a discipline. If you tell a scientist that there must be many ways of looking at the world, and that facts are useless because they are subjective, you may be right, but the context of science says you are wrong. This is not because science is always right, or is the true authority, but because it is a necessary part of science.

Relating this to my final project, I think that the position of the critics of evolution are in is very similar to the position we were in today during class. We argue that something cannot be true because of an unimportant argument. The truth of what is being said (evolution, end of history, creationism) is only as far reaching as the assumptions necessary to define it. Fukuyama said that History is ending, but he based his process on a number of assumptions ranging from what scale is appropriate to use to which historical events he would discuss. This applies to everything, including evolution.

A true argument is only as good as its weakest link. This idea relates directly to my final project, as I have been defining disciplines of investigation based on the assumptions necessary for them. Science assumes that the world is real, History assumes that people are important, Math assumes basic properties of numbers, Philosophy assumes the importance of human thought, and so on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Free Forum






PostPosted:      Post subject: ForumsLand.com

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CSW History class discussions Forum Index -> Art of Prediction All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forum hosted by ForumsLand.com - 100% free forum. Powered by phpBB 2.