sarahislahf
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 16
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm posting late, and I feel like most of the key points for the individual physicists have been iterated.
By embracing contradictions, and rejecting absolutes, Bohr made the intellectual sandbox a lot bigger and deeper for his peers and his successors to play in. Different results do not necessarily invalidate opposing ones, two seemingly opposing truths can exist side-by-side, which I think goes against human intuition. Heisenberg proffers the Uncertainty Principle, acknowledging the limits of human inquiry. Schroedinger made quantum physics more accessible.
...I agree with Ziz in that I am curious to see what arguments against light-changing-science could exist. Because I just don't see them. |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
